Should
the parts of a book be in a certain order? Yes, and there's a reason: so
readers, librarians, teachers, and booksellers can easily turn to the page in
the book to find a particular type of information. Understanding the order in
which they should appear may help you remember the difference between a
preface, a foreword, and an introduction? There is considerable confusion about
the difference between the three, and judging from what the Chicago Manual of
Style says, I mixed the two up myself in my history of the NIH Clinical Center,
where an editor made my Introduction a Foreword, which I then changed to a
Preface. It should have remained an Introduction.
Words
into Type succinctly characterizes the differences between a preface and intro:
"A preface or foreword deals with the genesis, purpose, limitations, and
scope of the book and may include acknowledgments of indebtedness; an
introduction deals with the subject of the book, supplementing and introducing
the text and indicating a point of view to be adopted by the reader. The
introduction usually forms a part of the text [and the text numbering system];
the preface does not." Go here for a fuller discussion of how a memoir
differs from an autobiography (or memoirs). .
The
foreword, says the Chicago Manual of Style, is usually written by someone other
than the author or editor, usually someone eminent (to lend credibility to the
book), and although the title page may say "Foreword by X," if the
foreword is only one or two pages (which is normal), the name of the foreword
writer normally appears at the end of the foreword. (The title or affiliation
of the author of the foreword may also appear there.) For details on
positioning of these elements, and what kind of type to use, refer to one of
those two manuals, if your publisher doesn't handle the formatting.
A.
ORDER OF FRONT MATTER
The normal order of parts of the
book:
Half title, or "bastard
title" (title only, on otherwise blank page)
Book card (or card page, listing
previous works by author, or books in same series)
·
Title page
·
Technical Information Page
o
Title
o
Author(s) / Editor(s) / Illustrator(s)
o
Designer
o
Publisher/Distributor
o
Price
o
Copyright notice
·
Dedication
·
Blank
·
Table of contents (labeled "Contents")
·
(List of) illustrations
·
(List of) tables
·
Foreword (by another person)
·
Editor's preface
·
Author's preface
·
Acknowledgments (if not part of preface, or if
not at back of book)
·
Introduction
·
Prologue
·
[list of abbreviations, timeline]
·
Second half title (optional)
B.
TEXTUAL PART
Main textual part of the book
Page numbers for
the front matter, up to the introduction, are small Roman numerals (x, xi, xii,
etc.). Some include the introduction in that numbering system, if it is
prefatory in nature (about the writing of the book). If it is more like part of
the text (essentially Chapter 1), start the regular page numbering with the
introduction.
C.
ORDER OF BACK MATTER (not all of these
are required!)
·
Epilogue
·
Afterword
·
Conclusion
·
Postscript
·
Appendix(es)or Addendum
·
Notes
·
Glossary
·
Bibliography
·
(List of) Contributors (perhaps with brief
biographical sketches)
·
Index(es)
·
Errata
Colophon (optional, including facts
of production, font, etc.--rarely used now)
The epigraph
(brief quotation or saying), according to Words into Type, may appear on the
title page or on the back of the dedication or may replace the second
half-title or be on the back of it, facing the text. To me it makes sense that
it be near the text.
The dedication
usually comes right after the copyright page, which is on the back of the title
page. Sometimes publishers squeeze it onto the top of the copyright page, when
space is tight.
What are the
purposes of a preface/intro? Here are some purposes members mentioned at a
meeting of the Washington Biography Group:
• To talk about
how you came to write the book, especially if that will help draw the reader
into the book. Perhaps best in the preface.
• To sell the
book to the potential reader/buyer (lure them, hook them, make them want to
read more). In the case of Ruth Selig writing about the death of her twin,
providing the personal details up front would be important, for example).
• To answer the
question: why this book? why now? why this person? why by this author?
• To talk about
how you got the information — what your main sources were (and how they differ
from other books on the subject, if this is book #189 on the Kennedys, for
example)
• To provide a
framework for what's to follow — the hooks on which to hang the pegs of story
details
• To provide, in
brief, your main argument or point of view about the subject. The alternative
is to not express your position clearly up front but instead to weave it into
the fabric of the biography so that the reader has to read the book to find it.
Critics may object to this. My impression is that you want to suggest your
conclusions or viewpoint clearly up front but express them more fully and
strongly in the concluding chapter, if there are conclusions to be made. What
you want to draw your reader in with is the story -- tell them just enough to
hook them, make them curious, and keep them reading.
What about
prologues? Linda Lear wrote a prologue (a term from dramaturgy) to start her
biography of Rachel Carson. A prologue starts the action and is PART of the
action, though it could take place in the middle of the action — it often
focuses on a pivotal moment. If you have a prologue, you must also have an
epilogue, says WBG's guru, Marc Pachter.
Some people feel
nobody reads the introduction; some people believe it's important because it’s
the first thing people look at. Obviously it should be done well, if the latter
is true even some of the time, but some people do skip it. Personally, I think
it's important that everything in the book be interesting, because you never
know where the reader will start, and you even want the ending to be good, so they
leave feeling satisfied and you get good word of mouth. With ebooks, Google
scans the first 500 words or so, and to the extent that that's what captures
readers, you want to put material upfront that will help "market"
your book and catch reader's attention. I tend to put acknowledgments at the
back but try to make them interesting, to give them content. I am sometimes
overruled, because others feel the acknowledgments should be up front, where
you are making it clear who helped you, and to show your gratitude.
Forewords,
Prefaces, and Introductions: Where to Begin? (Carol Saller, Lingua Franca,
Chronicle of Higher Education 4-5-12) offers further insights. Academic
writers: check out helpful tips in the comments section!
NOTE ON
SPELLING: A lot of people misspell foreword as foreward or even forward! It is
a "word" be"fore" the book itself. The foreword is usually
written by someone other than the author.
OTHER USEFUL
MATERIAL ON HOW TO MAKE A BOOK (AND LABEL THE PARTS CORRECTLY):
• Forewords,
Prefaces, and Introductions: Where to Begin? (Carol Saller, Lingua Franca,
Chronicle of Higher Education 4-5-12) offers further insights. Academic
writers: check out helpful tips in the comments section!
• Joel
Friedlander's Unabridged List of the Parts of a Book, one of many great
resources on a wonderful page of articles by The Book Designer (he's clearly
far more than that).
• Every
non-fiction book needs an index: Here’s why (Alan Rinzler's blog, The Book
Deal: An Inside View of Publishing)
• Editors, How
Much Is an Index Worth to You? (American Society of Indexers)
• Authors, How
Much Is an Index Worth to You? (American Society of Indexers)
• How to number
the pages of the front matter (SPAN's answers to self-publishers' frequently
asked questions (FAQ)
• How to Make a
Book: The Interior and Body of a Book (Creative Minds Press)
• Linchpindex:
The missing index for Seth Godin's "Linchpin" (a quirky online index
for Seth Godin's book Linchpin: Are You Indispensable?
• On Wikipedia
see preface, foreword, and introduction.
The importance
of good introductions and conclusions
"Even when
they have found the right story, some writers simply fail to make its relevance
clear from the beginning. Unused to writing introductory chapters, journalists
often neglect them, plunging into the narrative in a hurry to get on with it or
out of a fear of being boring. But a good introduction whets readers’ appetites
partly by showing us both why this story is going to entertain us, and why it’s
meaningful. Likewise, I sometimes receive manuscripts that end abruptly without
a proper conclusion. A dramatic climax, even an epilogue, is not the same as a
conclusion that helps the reader look back at how far he has come and reminds
him of the importance of that journey. It’s not obligatory, but it’s a terrific
tool for sending your reader off charged with excitement about your book – and
eager to tell other readers about it."
Source: patmcnees
No comments:
Post a Comment